by abourque » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:58 pm
People sacrifice themselves for more than religion. Just as you say, people put themselves at risk and may end up "sacrificing" themselves for safety, or the "greater good". I think the idea of self-sacrifice is an altruistic ideal can be fairly myopic at times. A fireman running into a burning building to save a child is something we regard with hero worship. But again the fireman has knowledge and experience on his side. He knows where to go, where to not step and has his safety gear. Does this make him less of a hero? I think this makes him more of a hero. He knows the dangers even more than the general layman.
Now what if a civilian ran into the burning building? We've all wondered what we would do if the situation were in front of us. Most of us probably like to think that we would run into the building to save the infant or innocent. Should we? My knowledge of fire is limited to what I learned in Boy Scouts and the The Discovery Channel. I would have a much lower chance of rescuing anyone let alone surviving. Essentially the fireman now has two victims to rescue instead of one.
So you probably shouldn't run into burning buildings. We'll leave that to the professionals. But what can you do? Just as you shouldn't run into a burning building you shouldn't ignore it altogether. Not if there is help you can provide. If you know first aid, or are an off duty fire or police officer, you should help. If you don't have any skills you would be better off keeping a distance and letting professionals handle it. You would probably cause a distraction.
After my ranting, where do I stand on religion and sacrifice? Sacrifice and altruism CAN be good. Sacrifice through informed altruism IS good. I would venture to say jihadists and fundamentalists that blow themselves up probably fall onto the non-informed side. They are promised a reward that they will never receive. I guess the real question is: Do they do it for the reward?